1. The defendant's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except for the dismissal or dismissal as set forth in the following 2. Thus, this is acceptable as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. On the third page of the judgment of the court of first instance, “Plaintiff G” in the part that was removed or dried shall be deemed “Plaintiff D”.

On the third side of the judgment of the court of first instance, "not guilty" was pronounced as follows.

On August 31, 2017 (Seoul Northern District Court 2016Da3181). After the prosecutor's appeal, the appellate court found the defendant guilty of the violation of the Guarantee of Workers' Retirement Benefits Act on the ground that at least dolusent recognition that the J had the obligation to pay retirement allowances to the above plaintiffs on June 29, 2018 and did not pay it (Seoul Northern District Court 2017No1806), and the above appellate judgment became final and conclusive around that time, on the ground that the court found the defendant guilty of the violation of the Guarantee of Workers' Retirement Benefits Act (Seoul Northern District Court 2017No1806). The "No. 25" in Part 5 of the first instance judgment of the court of first instance was added to "No. 25 and No. 31".

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal against the plaintiffs is dismissed as it is without merit.