Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 25, 2016, the Defendant forged private documents stated in the attached Form column of the attorney-at-law office located in the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Section B building C, and stated in the attached Form of the attorney-at-law delegation letter of the lawsuit of the agricultural company E in the attached Form of the attorney-at-law office, and attached Form of the attorney-at-law letter of delegation of the lawsuit of the agricultural company E, Gyeongnam-do, Gyeong-do, and representative director G

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged a letter of delegation of lawsuit in the name of the E Incorporated Agricultural Company E, which is a private document on rights and duties.

2. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in the preceding paragraph, exercised the right to use the forged document by delivering one copy of the delegation of the lawsuit as if it were duly constituted.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the defendant's partial statement H of witness H and G's investigation report ( telephone conversations between the accused's defense counsel and the accused's defense counsel), the details of the electronic litigation of the Supreme Court, a copy of the copy of the copy of the land register (including answers)

1. Relevant Article 231 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Determination as to the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. On June 7, 2016, the Defendant: (a) prepared a written agreement with G in order to raise funds for the agricultural company E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “instant company”) that is the representative director; and (b) transferred the title of representative director to G temporarily.

On the other hand, Co., Ltd. I (hereinafter “I”) provisionally seized the instant company’s property, and on June 8, 2016, demanded a contract deposit against the instant company and the Defendant, etc.