The defendant shall be innocent.

I. The summary of the facts charged was from April 6, 2004 to September 2012, the Defendant served as the head of the hotel business management department.

1. On June 17, 2011, the Defendant: (a) established a business partnership agreement with the Defendant’s wife as the representative director; and (b) decided to forge a business partnership agreement for the purpose of exercising the sales of the company-affiliated F and the sales of the guest room of the said company to the Plaintiff, which is entrusted by the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., in the name of the said company-affiliated partnership agreement, to receive an agency fee.

On September 10, 2011, the Defendant: (a) made a business partnership agreement between the LAF and the LAF; (b) entered into between the LAF and the LAF; (c) entered into a business partnership agreement between the LAF and the LAF; (d) entered into the agreement with the LAF in the office of the LAF hotel management department in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government with the computers in the above office; and (e) enter into the agreement with the LAF and the LAF with the content of “the purpose of the agreement: the guest room sales agency; (e) one year from September 9, 201 to September 8, 201; and (e) one year from September 8, 2012; and (e) enter into the agreement with the LAF and the KAF; and (e) output it into the name of the above J, and had the corporate seal reduction in the name of the J representative

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the defendant has forged a business partnership agreement under the name of the KJ representative director, which is a private document concerning rights and obligations.

B. The defendant 1-A

After entering into a business partnership agreement between the LAB and the LAB in the same manner as that of paragraph, the name of the company in Seocho-gu Seoul, Seocho-gu, the name of the company: J, the representative of the company: K, and output it and arbitrarily stamped the corporate staff of the K representative director in the name of the above J which the defendant kept in custody.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the defendant has forged a business partnership agreement under the name of the KJ representative director, which is a private document concerning rights and obligations.

2. Around September 2011, the Defendant for the events of the above investigation documents is a document in which two copies of the above business partnership agreement, as stated in the above 1., are duly formed.