Text
A person shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a term of April, 3, 4, or 5 with prison labor for the crimes of subparagraphs 1, 2, 6, or 7 of the judgment of the defendant.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[27] On June 20, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of suspension of the execution on June 28, 2014 by imprisonment with labor for a violation of road traffic laws at the Daejeon High Court on June 20, 2014, and the judgment became final and conclusive on June 28, 2014. On November 21, 2014, the Daejeon District Court sentenced the Defendant to six months of imprisonment with labor for a violation of road traffic laws (non-licenseless driving) at the Daejeon District Court’s Incheon District Court’s Support, and became final and conclusive on February 5, 2015.
1. On October 15, 2014, the Defendant, without authority, forged an application for change of terminal/USIM in the name of “E, F, and G” in the name of “F,” signed by the F, and signed the application for change of the terminal/USIM in the name of “F,” which is a private document related to rights and obligations.
2. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, issued a forged F’s application for change of / USIM to an employee under the name of the opening agent who is not aware of the fact that it was a document duly formed.
[2015 order 338]
3. On February 5, 2014, the Defendant: (a) prepared an application for entry (title change) by a mobile phone with the fact that “D” operated by the Defendant in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seocheon-gu, means that “J shall transfer H’s mobile phone numbers (I) to J using a tample-type fluorial book; and (b) signed on “J”, “K in the resident registration number column, “K”, “J” in the customer address column, and “J” in the applicant/party address column; and (c) signed on the name of the applicant/party column.
Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the Defendant forged one copy of the application for entry by the mobile phone under the name of J, which is a private document on rights and obligations.
4. On February 5, 2014, the Defendant issued a copy of the application for entry of a cell phone under the name of J, which was forged, to an employee in the name of the opening agency who knew of the forged fact, and exercised it.
5. The defendant.