Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for each crime of the 2016 senior group 8686 of the judgment of the court below, and the case of the 2016 senior group 9509 of the judgment.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A around September 29, 2016, after being sentenced to a two-year suspended sentence for special larceny, etc. at the Seoul Central District Court, the judgment became final and conclusive around October 7, 2016.

【Criminal Defendant A’s crime of 2016 Highest Order 8686 (“Defendant A”) committed the instant act with F and G, the Defendant was in a French place in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu on February 2, 2016, G’s resident registration certificate under the name of another person was put to the Defendant and F, and the Defendant used F and this to open the cell phone under the name of another, and then, intended to divide the said cell phone into money by disposing of it to a third party.

1. Crimes related to opening of mobile phones around April 16, 2016;

A. Pursuant to the above conspiracy, the Defendant, along with F, stated “J, K, Goyang-gu L, Goyang-gu L, Goyang-gu, J, and Goyang-gu L” in the customer column of the applicant column, signed the J, and signed the J to the customer column of the application site of this Y by using the verification-type pen for the purpose of exercising the right, at around April 16, 2016, the Defendant stated “J, K, Goyang-gu L, Goyang-gu L, Goyang-gu” and “J” in the customer column of the application site of this Y-gu mobile subscription site with the verification-type pen for the purpose of continuously exercising the right, and signed it next to that.

Accordingly, the Defendant, in collusion with F and G, provided two copies of an application for this mobile membership in the name of J, which is a private document related to rights and obligations, for the purpose of uttering.

B. The Defendant issued F along with F the date, time, place, etc. set forth in the foregoing paragraph (a) to the Defendant as if he were genuinely formed two copies of the lele mobile membership application in the name of J, which was forged as above.

Accordingly, the Defendant, in collusion with F and G, exercised two chapters of the application form in the name of the J. J.

(c)

The Defendant’s fraud, together with F, is the date, time, place, and fact in the above paragraph.