1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On June 29, 194, the Plaintiff acquired a Class 2 ordinary driver’s license (B), Class 1 ordinary driver’s license on September 25, 1997, and around 01:35, Feb. 27, 2018, the Plaintiff taken measures such as the Plaintiff’s injury to the victim of the instant accident and the front part of the e-mail vehicle, etc., “the victim of the instant accident and the front part of the e-mail of the e-mail, etc., at the e-mail-si apartment parking lot from the e-mail-si Seoul Metropolitan City National Assembly to the southwest of 15,065% of blood alcohol alcohol level (applicable e-mark public formula) under the influence of alcohol, while driving approximately 22 km in the front part of the National Assembly (hereinafter “the instant drunk driving”). In addition, the Plaintiff neglected the duty of safety driving in the direction of the e-mail road in the direction of the 63rd intersection.”

B. On April 27, 2018, the Defendant: (a) applied Article 93(1)6 of the Road Traffic Act to the Plaintiff that caused the instant traffic accident and did not take necessary measures; and (b) revoked the driver’s license as stated in the preceding paragraph (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

C. The Plaintiff appealed and filed an administrative appeal with the Central Administrative Appeals Commission, but was dismissed on September 5, 2017.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 7 through 11, Eul evidence 1 to 17, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) Occupationally Injury and denial of escape (the instant traffic accident in Chapter 1), even if the victim E was not at risk of injury due to the instant traffic accident, and suffered family injury.