logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2015.10.22 2015고정1381
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,200,00.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 3, 2015, the Defendant driven a “B”-type car and driven the said car on April 4, 2015, and continued to drive the said car at a speed lower than two-lanes between the two-lanes in the direction of the National Assembly, at the end of the National Assembly.

Since there is an intersection where a signal, etc. is installed, the defendant engaged in driving service has a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle in accordance with the signals by reducing the speed and by properly examining the right and the right of the road.

The Defendant neglected to do so and led to the faultless progress, even though the yellow signal was a stop signal on the front side, which led to the failure of the Defendant, and the part of the victim C(58 years old) driving “D” driven by the green signal in the direction of the parliamentary parliamentary death of the National Assembly at the mouth of the mouth C(58 years old) 5 taxi driving, which was directly driven by the green signal, was shocked by the front side of the Defendant’s vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered, by negligence in the above occupational negligence, injury to the victim C (the 58-year-old age), such as cutting the bones of the bones, which requires approximately four weeks of medical treatment, and injury to the victim E (the 39-year-old age), who was a passenger on the said taxi, to undergo approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. A statement of the developments leading up to the preparation of E (E, 39 years old);

1. A traffic accident investigation report, traffic accident occurrence report, and traffic accident report;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. On July 16, 2015, the first protocol of trial, dated July 16, 2015, stating that the Defendant stated “to recognize the facts charged of this case” as “the fact charged.”

However, the defendant entered the intersection from the end of green signal at the direction of progress and passed the intersection at the time of yellow signal, and the si that continued to proceed under the speed is facing one's own vehicle, and mental, economic, and economic.

arrow