1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On June 5, 1987, the Plaintiff obtained a Class 1 ordinary driver's license, but was revoked on December 13, 1991 due to unpaid regular aptitude test (Renewal), and again acquired a Class 1 ordinary driver's license on December 30, 1991. On June 12, 2004, the Plaintiff was revoked the driver's license by driving a motor vehicle during the administrative disposition period for the driver's license.

B. On September 6, 2005, the Plaintiff acquired a Class 1 ordinary car driver’s license (B) and around 22:10 on September 29, 2017, the Plaintiff: (a) driven a small-scale taxi and turn to the left about about 5 km per hour at the sloping-dong community service center of Sung-dong; (b) caused the victim F (L, 15 years old) to go to the left-hand side of the front left-hand side of the said taxi due to the shock of the victim’s right side side of the treatment days on both sides of the treatment days (hereinafter “instant accident”).

(C) The Defendant, on December 5, 2017, did not take any necessary measures, such as immediately stopping and aiding the said victim. The Defendant, applying Article 93(1)6 of the Road Traffic Act to the Plaintiff on the ground that he did not take any necessary measures after having injured the Plaintiff due to the instant traffic accident (hereinafter “instant disposition”). The instant disposition is subject to the revocation of the driver’s license as stated in Article 93(1)6 of the Road Traffic Act (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

D) The Plaintiff filed an administrative appeal with the Central Administrative Appeals Commission on April 3, 2018, but was dismissed on the ground that the Plaintiff rejected the appeal. [In the absence of any dispute over the grounds for recognition, entry of the evidence No. 1-1, No. 2, No. 2-3, and evidence No. 1-1 through No. 12, No. 2-2, and the purport of the entire pleadings,

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's assertion 1) Occupationally Injury and denial of escape (the victim above Chapter 1 did not suffer injury due to the accident of this case, and the victim suffered injury to domestic affairs, the plaintiff's question whether the above victim is fine for negligence.