logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2016.04.15 2015고정1104
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who uses a DNA “D” on the Internet site “C”.

No person shall conceal any false information openly through an information and communications network with intent to defame any other person, thereby impairing the reputation of any other person.

The Defendant exchanged with each other’s visibility via the victim E (the other, 38 years old) and the above website, but the Defendant had attempted to confirm the fact that the victim reselled to another person at a higher price in exchange with the Defendant, and to slander the victim.

1. On January 4, 2015, around 15:35, 2015, the Defendant posted a notice stating that a member who uses Adidi “C” on the Internet site’s website’s online transaction bulletin board using a smartphone from the Defendant’s smartphone in the vicinity of the Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government website is exchanging BMW vehicle with visibility’s visibility. The Defendant is not only a country but also a country. The head of the match team is an underground street.

The ID phone number is the same as the number of copies returned, and all of which are used, G, H, and F, and “G heading two types of caps, which are different from the previous I and J, so it would be open to the public as soon as possible, because this writing is written due to the closure of the two types of caps, i.e., the previous I and J.

ㅋㅋ 어디까지 까부나 보자 H 검색해도 죄다 나오는 구만 업자 주제에” 라는 댓 글의 허위 사실을 게시하였다.

However, in fact, the above "F" is not the ID of the victim, and the above notice was not the victim, and the victim purchased a large quantity of goods at a low price and sold them at a low price, and was not the so-called "the so-called "the specialized width" of the victim.

Accordingly, the Defendant, through the information and communication network, damaged the reputation of the victim by openly disclosing false information.

2. On January 4, 2015, around 17:58, the Defendant, using the Defendant’s smartphone in the vicinity of the route of Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on January 4, 2015, in the title “G =F = H = Business Operator’s Accusation” on the bulletin board as referred to in paragraph 1 of the said paragraph and the Defendant’s number is two.

arrow