A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a company B (hereinafter referred to as “stock company”) and C’s unemployment. D is the Defendant’s spouse’s worker B, and D is the Defendant’s spouse’s worker B, and F is the employee of B. G is the original course of art and science required for C to register in order to perform the forest design services, and as a result, G lends the name to A to be registered as an employee and receives KRW 200,000 per month in return. The employment maintenance support system is a system that provides for a certain portion of the personnel expenses to be paid by the employer in the competent employment support center, where an employer who is inevitable to adjust employment due to the decrease in production, decrease in sales, increase in inventory, etc., establishes a plan for employment maintenance measures, and submits it to the employment support center under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Employment and Labor, such as temporary suspension, temporary suspension, training, and replacement of human resources, and pays wage or temporary closure allowances to workers subject to employment maintenance.

The Defendant, while operating each of the above companies, led to the shortage of operating funds, etc., received employment maintenance support payments from the Defendant and G to use them as operating funds, etc. by pretending that Defendant G would have pretended to be an employee, or that D would have paid leave benefits even if he did not have been temporarily employed.

The Defendant, around June 26, 2018, entered into a labor-management consultation with the head of the Tong-si 1, 69, the head of the Busan Regional Labor Office, and the head of the Busan Regional Labor Office on the fact that the Defendant was not the B employee but the Defendant applied for the paid leave and the support for the maintenance of employment due to the decline in sales. However, the Defendant’s false statement of the plan to take measures for the maintenance of employment (temporary retirement) was made to the effect that the Defendant was taking measures for the maintenance of employment due to the decline in sales and that there was a false labor-management consultation on the above temporary retirement (temporary retirement).