Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment for ten months.
Defendant
B shall be punished by a fine of 3,000,000 won.
Defendant
B The above fine.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A on July 6, 201, in the Western Branch of the Daegu District Court, was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny, etc. in October, 201, and the judgment becomes final and conclusive on the 14th of the same month and is currently in the grace period.
1. Defendant A
A. On October 1, 2012, the Defendant: (a) intruded the F structure with the entrance door opened by the victim E in Daegu Northern-gu, Daegu-gu, via the entrance door opened by the victim E; (b) opened the front door to the front door of the pole-type line using the bridge; (c) laid down the front door on the front door of the bridge; and (d) cut off the 3.6 million won of the market price at which the building was located with 2 bit (90km) and stolen it.
B. On October 1, 2012, at F around 03:00 on the first and second anniversary of the date, the Defendant intruded into F’s F structure by the foregoing method, and stolen it with 200 S Q Q Q cable 50 meters in the amount of KRW 600,000,000, and 1.3 million in the market price.
C. On October 1, 2012, the Defendant, at F around 03:00 on the first and fourth day of October 2012, 201, intruded the F structure into F structure by the foregoing method, and stolen the F structure with 3 dong board (21kg) equivalent to the market price of 600,000,000 won in the factory, and 4 bit (40kg) in the market price of the same product.
2. Defendant B is engaged in the trade of scrap metal, etc. from Daegu-gu to H with the trade name of H.
On October 2012, 2012, the Defendant 1-A from H operated by the Defendant at the first am and am.
The market value of the stolen victim E, such as paragraph 3.6 million won, was purchased at 2 knife location (90kg).
In such cases, the defendant, who is engaged in the water-related business, has a duty of care to verify whether he/she is stolen by ascertaining the personal information A, etc., while checking the process of acquisition of electric wires, etc., motive for sale, and price suitable for transaction prices.
Nevertheless, the defendant neglected the above care and neglected the judgment on the stolen.