beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal power] On November 16, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of six months for special larceny at the Busan District Court Branch Branch of the Busan District Court on November 24, 2018, and the judgment became final and conclusive on November 24, 2018 (after that, the suspended sentence was revoked on July 30, 2019), and on October 15, 2019, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of eight months for special larceny, and imprisonment for three months for fraud, respectively, and the said sentence became final and conclusive on November 12, 2019.
around 21:30 on March 15, 2019, the Defendant, “2019 Highest 2568”, had a 250,00 won in cash owned by the victim, 2220,000 won in total of the market value, and 13:0,000 won in tobacco equivalent to the total of 620,00 won in the market value, using a cresh in the D convenience point of the operation of the victim C in Ulsan-gun-gun, Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, Seoul-do.
"2019 Highest 2946"
1. The Defendant, E, and F’s conspiracy Defendant and E were the parties with each other. The F, Defendant, E, and F, by committing so-called “Internet Goods Fraud” with the mind of raising a living cost, and E, the role of providing contact information with the victim with the Internet “G” bulletin board, the F posted an article as if it were sold, and directly communicating with the victim who reported and contacted the article, respectively, and the Defendant is willing to act in charge of providing the account to be used for committing the crime.
According to the above public offering, on January 5, 2018, F posted a false statement on “H Ba” by accessing “H Ba” in the Gwangju Mine-gu to the account of E and “excluding 100,000 won for private construction and repair expenses due to damage to opphone E”. On the other hand, F sent the price of goods to the victim I who reported and contacted the above writing, as if it were to deliver the smartphone.
However, even if the defendant, E, and F receives smartphone payments from the victim, the defendant, E, and F shall have the intention or ability to send the goods normally.