A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

The defendant 310,00 won to E, 260,000 won to H, and 273.

Punishment of the crime

On September 6, 2018, the Defendant posted a notice on the I’s bulletin board to sell a opphone 7 mobile phone at the 2019 Highest 1254, and made a false statement to the victimJ, which reported the above writing to the Defendant, to send the cost of goods to the Defendant by door-to-door dispatch of the cell phone.

However, the defendant did not have the above mobile phone so that he did not have the intention or ability to send goods to the victim even if he receives the price from the victim.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received 3.10,000 won from the victim to the L Bank account (M) in the name of K as the price for goods at around 09:35 on the same day. From around that time to March 8, 2019, the Defendant acquired 5,865,50 won in total from the victims over 28 times, as shown in the attached crime list, from around that time to March 8, 2019.

On February 20, 2019, the Defendant posted a false statement to the effect that “Aphone7 mobile phone device is sold” on the NKapet bulletin at an insular place, and that the Defendant sent the said device to the victimO who reported the fact that he/she deposited KRW 1.80,000 if he/she deposited KRW 1.80,000.

However, since the defendant did not have the above equipment, there was no intention or ability to send the above equipment even if he received money from the victim.

The Defendant received 180,000 won from the victim’s Pbank account in the name of the Defendant on the same day.

Around November 15, 2018, the Defendant posted a letter stating that he/she sold a virtual phone on I’s bulletin board, and made a false statement that he/she would send the mobile phone to the victim B who reported the above letter to the Defendant and made contact with the Defendant, if he/she remitted the price of the goods to the victim B.

However, the defendant did not have the above mobile phone so that he did not have the intention or ability to send goods to the victim even if he receives the price from the victim.

The Defendant is the victim as above.