logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2012.12.26 2012고단1892
범인도피
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months, by imprisonment with prison labor for one year and by fine for 7,00,000 won.

Defendant

B above.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant B

A. On August 24, 2012, the Defendant violated the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. (the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc.) operated a sexual traffic establishment under the trade name of the 2nd class 205 of the 2nd class of the 2nd class of Seocheon-si, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seoul, “Emagy” and employed female employees F.

The Defendant received 100,000 won per man in return for sexual traffic from the male grandchildren who found the above business establishment around the above time, and caused F to have the male grandchildren knife and knife by hand, and to have them do the similar act by means of putting the sexual flag of the male grandchildren under the knife below, and arranged sexual traffic.

B. From March 2012 to April 24, 2012, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 5 million on August 23, 2012 due to a crime of violating the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. (i.e., arranging sexual traffic) with a view to engaging in sexual traffic brokerage business in the said “Embage”, and the said summary order became final and conclusive on September 11, 2012.

On April 24, 2012, the Defendant: (a) when this case was controlled, the Defendant had concerns over the continued operation of a business establishment under the Defendant’s name and the possibility of being severely punished if re-controled; (b) on June 24, 2012, the Defendant: (c) drafted a new Emaz lease agreement under the name of A, as if A had taken over the said Emaz; and (d) requested A to receive an investigation as if A was the owner of a commercial sex business establishment if it was under control.

Therefore, around June 27, 2012, the defendant and A newly prepare a lease agreement as they lease the E-Mazin from the office located on the fiveth floor of the above DFD, and the defendant was under the control of police around August 24, 2012 while he operated sexual traffic in E-Mazin.

As above, the Defendant was under control and suspected of arranging sexual traffic.

arrow