Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, and each of the defendants B shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Defendant

A 2,550,000 won shall be collected from A.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] Defendant A was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years and a fine of two million won for six months, due to a crime of violation of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. in the Gyeyang Branch of the Suwon District Court on January 25, 2013, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on April 19, 2013.

Defendant

B On April 24, 2014, on the grounds of the violation of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. (the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc.), the judgment became final and conclusive on May 2, 2014.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Defendant A

A. The Defendant violated the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. (the Act on the Punishment of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc.) is the business owner who has operated commercial sex acts establishments on the 5th floor of the D Building in the middle of the game with the trade name of “C”, and B is a person who is a chief executive officer of the place of business in the case of regulating the police under the condition that he receives KRW 3 million per month from the Defendant.

From the end of March 2013 to the end of May 20, 2013, from September 1, 2013 to November 15, 2013, the Defendant and B provided six smuggling equipped with bathing and simplified beds in the above C, four waiting rooms, four accounting units, etc., and provided approximately 10-120,000 won to male customers who found the above business place, and had sexual traffic women do sexual intercourse with customers.

As a result, the defendant conspired with B to arrange commercial sex acts.

B. On December 2012, the Defendant offered to B a proposal to the effect that “In the time of control, four million won should be given monthly pay to the width instead of being punished as a unemployment owner, and a fine should be imposed.” In the event that control is placed on the investigation agency, the Defendant caused B to feel a false confession as if he was the unemployment owner of the said CP business establishment, and entered into a lease contract of the said CP brokerage place in preparation for having B undergo an investigation into the unemployment owner, thereby allowing B to enter into a lease contract in the name of B.

Therefore, the defendant is the above sexual traffic business place.