logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2019.11.22 2019고단4967
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)등
Text

[Defendant A] The defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months.

319,760,00 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

Defendant .

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On July 19, 2019, Defendant B was sentenced to the Daegu District Court for a period of two years of suspension of execution on June, 2019 due to a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc., and the said judgment became final and conclusive on October 17, 2019.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Defendant A

(a) No one shall arrange sexual traffic for business purposes, in violation of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc.;

Nevertheless, from October 1, 2016 to April 24, 2018, Defendant A loaned the name of the business operator of the said establishment from Defendant B, a franchisor, and arranged sexual traffic by lending the name of the business operator of the said establishment from Defendant B, a franchisor, to Defendant A, who actually operated the said establishment, and allowing sexual traffic women, who are male and female workers who visited the said establishment, to have sexual intercourse with each other, and as a result, 160,000 won per day after being issued by the average of 70,000 won per day from sexual purchasing to the women of sexual traffic.

As a result, Defendant A arranged sexual traffic for business purposes.

B. On September 2016, Defendant A said that Defendant A would take over and operate a “E” commercial sex acts business establishment,” and that Defendant B, the franchisor, “If he lends the name of E, he would give KRW 1,700,000,000 per month in return for the lending of the name of E. If it is controlled, he would be investigated by the operator of the business establishment. If a fine is imposed, he will be given on behalf of the operator of the business establishment, and the consolation money will also be given.”

On the other hand, when an investigation was conducted on November 27, 2017 due to the fact that sexual traffic was conducted at the above establishment around the same time, Defendant A instructed Defendant B to state the detailed operating methods, etc., such as “I am informed that I will not interfere with the investigation of the business owner. I am me about the me who will not interfere with the investigation of the business owner. I am me. I see that sexual traffic is recognized, the daily customers are 7 to 8, and the price of sexual traffic is divided into half of sexual traffic women, and 180,000 won is divided into half of sexual traffic women.”

arrow