logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.05.11 2017고정125
위계공무집행방해등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor at the Seoul Central District Court on September 28, 2016, and the judgment was finalized on December 24, 2016.

Defendant

A around December 2015, upon receipt of a request from E Egypt D to the effect that “E, E, a Egypt, shall be invited as if he had a business relationship with the Korean business entity and shall enter the Republic of Korea,” and the defendant F, a corporation, the representative of the defendant B, prepared a false invitation letter as if he, as if he, invited the above E, to purchase a part of the automobile, and delivered it to E through D and E in the Republic of Korea, after receiving a notarized invitation letter, and the defendant B received a notarized invitation letter, and delivered it to E through D and Egypt.

On December 29, 2015, the Defendants stated the entry report as “business” in the entry examination site of Incheon International Airport in the Jung-gu Incheon International Airport entry examination site in the Jung-gu Incheon International Airport (272), even though they were not to purchase automobile parts to E Co., Ltd. F, and presented the false invitation letter to H, who is a public official in charge of entry inspection at the same place, to undergo reexamination.

Defendant

B Upon receipt of entry review, E prepared a false letter of invitation and departure guarantee, and presented it to the public official I in charge of reexamination by facsimile to enter the Republic of Korea.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired with D, G, and E to invite them to enter the Republic of Korea by illegal means, and thereby interfered with the performance of duties concerning the entry inspection of the public official in charge of the above entry inspection by deceptive means.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement of suspect interrogation of E in the police station;

1. A written indictment (a written accusation against an immigration offender);

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Investigation reports (verification of data and computerized data entered in the review process, such as a letter of invitation), investigation reports (to make a statement by the staff member of the Incheon Airport Immigration Management Office), and investigation reports (the immigration control office);

arrow