logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2017.12.22 2017도16596
공직선거법위반
Text

The appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

The grounds of appeal are examined.

1. No company, corporation or organization related to a person who wishes to be a candidate for a National Assembly member or its officers and employees shall make contributions in connection with the election concerned before the election period, and in the election period, any person who wishes to be a candidate for a National Assembly member or political party to which he belongs, regardless of whether it

In this case, the act of making contributions by disclosing the name of a candidate for a National Assembly member or a person who wishes to be a candidate for a National Assembly member or a political party to which he belongs, or in such a manner as presumed to be a donation by the political party to which he belongs, shall be deemed to be a candidate for a National Assembly member or a contribution act for a political party (Article 114(1) of the Public Official Election Act). Here, the term “election” in this context is sufficient in relation to the election concerned, such as the motive for the relevant election or the fluority of the fluority of the fluority of the fluority of the fluority of the fluority of the fluority of the fluority of the fluority of the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the fluor of the 200.

(1) The Defendant worked on April 11, 2012.

arrow