(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2016.09.12 2015고정1232

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2016.09.12 2015고정1232

상해

Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. Around 00:00 on May 15, 2015, the Defendant asserted the assault by the victim E (39 years old) in the “D” Dondong, Busan, Busan, Daegu, on the part of the Defendant, against the victim E (39 years old). As a result, the Defendant followed the victim’s bridge and body several times through several times, and led the victim to a shaking of head debt, thereby leading the victim to approximately two weeks of treatment.

2. The Defendant denies the fact that he did not inflict any injury on the victim, such as the facts charged, and thus, this Court affirmed the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly completed the investigation: (i) in police investigation, E was scambling the victim’s head debt, and carried out the arms and legs on the part of the victim’s scambling, and thereafter engaged in scambling and scambling the victim’s scam.

However, this Court stated that the Defendant was head and arms from the Defendant in this Court.

At the time of making a statement, at least two to three persons including the Defendant under the influence of alcohol, including the Defendant, were assaulted by at least two to three persons including the Defendant, and what part was the price from anyone, is stated to the effect that it cannot be accurately memoryed, and ② F did not regard the Defendant as the place where the Defendant prices the victim.

A statement is made by G, while G showed the head of a male, the defendant was not at the price of the victim, even though G showed the head of the male.

In full view of the following facts: (a) the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone is sufficient to prove that the Defendant had suffered injury, such as the facts charged, to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt, in view of the fact that the Defendant had been serving as a majority of other male and female main employees, other than the Defendant, and that there was a franchis in the process of speaking or leaving the Defendant at the bar.

It is insufficient to view it, and there is no other evidence to prove it.

3...

유사 판례

-부산지방법원 2017.02.10 2016노3706

-서울동부지방법원 2017.06.30 2017노183

-인천지방법원 2013.06.21 2013노736

-인천지방법원 2013.02.15 2012고정4387

-창원지방법원 2014.12.10 2014노1773