The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. According to the consistent statement of the victim, witness E and F in support of the facts charged in the instant case, the fact that the Defendant inflicted multiple injuries on the victim, such as scambling the victim’s head, scambling, etc. can be acknowledged.

Nevertheless, the court below determined that the victim was not injured, and the judgment of the court below is erroneous by misunderstanding the facts, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

2. Determination

A. A. Around 02:00 on August 7, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around 02:0, the summary of the facts charged: (b) around 812 of the C hotel in Busan metropolitan Daegu; (c) around 52 years old; (d) the victim D (in the case of women, 52 years old); (c) and (d) the victim was faced with the victim, and (e) the victim was deprived of the victim’s head debt, thereby leading the victim to a multi-lock in need of treatment for about two weeks.

B. The lower court determined that the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone is insufficient to acknowledge the fact that the Defendant inflicted the injury on the victim, and there is no evidence to acknowledge it otherwise, in light of the following: (a) the victim’s diagnosis report on injury to the victim contains the following circumstances: (i) the victim’s “accomponion tyption” occurred in the victim’s “hump, check, streke, streke, and streke; (b) the victim stated in the court of the lower judgment to the effect that “numping the victim’s head with any circumstance, any circumstance,” and (iii) E only memorys the victim’s head with each other, and stated that “the victim was the victim’s head with his head with his head with more than two,” in view of the fact that the victim was the victim’s head with his head.

Furthermore, the court below held that the charged facts of this case are against the victim.