The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. According to the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, including the victim E’s statement with the summary of the grounds for appeal, it can be sufficiently recognized that the Defendant assaulted the victim E and inflicted an injury on the left-hand sponsor by assaulting the victim E as stated in the facts charged in the instant case.

Nevertheless, the court below ruled the defendant not guilty, and there is an error of law by misunderstanding facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. Determination

A. On May 15, 2015, at around 00:00, the Defendant asserted the assault by the victim E (39 years old) in the “D” Don-gu Busan Shipping Daegu C, and, as a result, took the victim’s bridge and body several times through several times, and shaking the head debt, thereby leading the victim to approximately two weeks of treatment.

B. The lower court determined as follows, i.e., the following circumstances acknowledged by the record, i.e., (i) the victim E, in the police investigation, was scambling the victim’s head debt, was carried out several arms and legs, and thereafter, was engaged in two scamblings and sckes of the victim’s head debt.

However, the court of the court below stated that the defendant was the head and the arms from the defendant.

At the time of making a statement, the victim was assaulted by at least two to three persons, including the defendant under the influence of alcohol, and stated to the effect that it shall not accurately memory as to whom part was the price by any means; and ② F did not regard as the part where the defendant prices the victim.

A statement is made by G, while G showed the head of a male, the defendant was not at the price of the victim, even though G showed the head of the male.

At the same time, there are many male and female main employees in addition to the defendant at the case scene, and the defendant is speaked or comes from the main office.