logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2017.06.09 2017고단962
공무집행방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2017. 3. 27. 00:41 경 안산시 단원구 사세 충 열로 1 열녀문 사거리에서, 술에 취한 상태로 노상에 누워 있던 중 112 신고를 받고 출동한 경기 안산 단원 경찰서 B 파출소 소속 경찰 공무원인 순경 C과 순경 D으로부터 안전한 곳으로 이동할 것을 요청 받게 되자 위 경찰관들에게 “ 병신 아 내가 너 좆되게 할 수 있다, 꺼져 좆같은 새끼야 ”라고 욕설을 하면서 발로 위 C의 허벅지 부위를 1회 걷어차고, 이를 말리는 위 D의 어깨에 부착되어 있던 무전기를 바닥에 던지고 발로 D의 복부를 1회 걷어찼다.

At around 01:10 on the same day, the Defendant continued to board the patrol vehicle to have the Defendant returned home to the same F convenience store in the same Gu E, at one time, followed by the scam of the above D, and the shoulder of G, who is a public official belonging to the police of the same district forces, after boarding the patrol vehicle, was scambling the shoulder of G with the seat of G with his hand.

계속하여 피고인은 같은 날 01:25 경 같은 구 H, 202호에 있는 피고인의 주거지 앞에서 귀가를 요청하는 위 C의 얼굴과 다리 부위를 발로 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers on the protection of people's lives and bodies and the prevention of traffic hazards.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with respect to G, C, and D;

1. Photographss by capturing a fluoral video;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing damage and on-site photographs;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is that the contents of the Defendant’s assault committed against the public officials on duty in the instant case are not weak, the number of the assaulted public officials is not sufficient, the circumstances leading to the instant crime, the investigation attitude at the investigative agency, etc.

arrow