A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. 폭행 피고인은 2016. 5. 18. 22:30 경 대구 서구 C에 있는 식당 앞 길을 걸어가던 중 그곳 길가에 정차되어 있던 피해자 D(30 세) 운전의 E 승용차를 발견하고 이유 없이 발로 위 승용차의 뒷 범퍼 부분을 걷어찼다.

이에, 위 D이 위 승용차에서 내려 피고인에게 항의하자 발로 위 D의 배와 낭 심을 수 회 걷어찬 후, 손으로 위 D의 머리를 수 회 때리고, 위 D의 지인인 피해자 F( 여, 26세) 이 이를 말리자 주먹으로 위 F의 머리를 1회 때린 후 발로 위 F의 머리를 1회 걷어찼다.

계속하여 피고인은, 위 장면을 목격한 피해자 G( 여, 57세) 이 피고인을 제지하려 하자 발로 위 G의 턱을 1회 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted victims.

2. The Defendant: (a) arrested a police officer belonging to the police station of Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Police Station H District of H District, who was dispatched after receiving a report of the instant assault case around 22:50 on the same day, to the police officer I; (b) was on board the patrol vehicle, and was committing assault, such as spite, spite, etc., on the face of the Defendant I, who was taking twice the same line on the front side of the said patrol vehicle while going under the said H district.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the police officer's criminal investigation and arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to I, G, D, and F;

1. - Photographs, - Application of the law of the place of service

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act (a point of violence) and Article 136 of the Criminal Act (a point of interference with the performance of official duties), and the choice of imprisonment for each crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (a) of the suspended sentence provides that the Defendant appears to have an attitude to make a confession and reflect, each of the crimes in this case occurred in a state of drunken by the Defendant, and each of the damage is minor, and the same criminal records and fines are imposed on the Defendant.