logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2014.12.18 2014고정2466
명예훼손
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in the leasing business, and was living together with the victim C's mother D.

1. On October 29, 2013, around 14:00, the victim’s reputation is undermined by having five employees, such as Suwon Police Station in Suwon-dong, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and two civil petitioners in the economic2 team office via several times the victim’s statement that “if a quality investigation is conducted on the spot where five employees and two civil petitioners are located, such as the person in charge and the person in charge and the person in charge and at the economic2 team office.”

2. On November 6, 2013, around 14:00, at the time of Suwon-si, the Sinwon Police Station investigation into the Suwon Police Station located in Suwon-si, and at the economic2 team office, five employees, such as the police officer E, and civil petitioners in the economic2 team office, etc., damaged the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts by openly making the victim’s words “a space where a woman is frightd with the birth of his/her mother and the same frighting place,” and by openly pointing out false facts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (refusing defamation);

1. Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act and Article 307 (2) of the same Act concerning the applicable criminal facts, the selection of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. To reduce part of the fines determined by the summary order in consideration of the fact that the defendant's reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (hereinafter referred to as the "provisional payment order") is late against the defendant.

arrow