logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 해남지원 2014.10.01 2014고단127
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등재물손괴등)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 6, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of suspension of execution in August 8, 2013 due to a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective, deadly weapons, etc.) in the Southern Branch of the Gwangju District Court (a collective, deadly weapons, etc.). The judgment becomes final and conclusive on November 14, 2013,

1. Around May 8, 2014, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (collectives, deadly weapons, etc., damage, etc.) caused damage to KRW 422,741,00 on the repair cost of the said passenger bus, which was driven in front of the “E” located in Jindo-gun D, Jindo-gun, Jindo-gun, with no justifiable reason, and was parked in the said place without any reason. The Defendant collected cement block, which is a dangerous object in the said place, from the front glass of the said passenger bus, and then laid down the said cement block in good hands.

2. On May 8, 2014, the Defendant damaged the said taxi by drinking in front of the “H restaurant” located in Jindo-gun G, Jindo-gun, Jindo-gun, with no justifiable reason, so that the said taxi would amount to KRW 121,000 of the repairing cost, as the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol.

3. On May 8, 2014, around 03:23, on the ground that the victim I (the age of 53) who is the driver of Jindo-gun 26, was in accordance with the act of damage as described in paragraph (2) before the Jindo-gun, Jindo-gun, Jindo-gun 26, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim, on the ground that the victim I (the age of 53), who is the driver of Jindo-gun Do-gun, was in accordance with the act of damage as described in paragraph (2).

4. Obstruction of performance of official duties.

A. On May 8, 2014, around 03:35, the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender by the act as described in Paragraph 2 and 3 “B” before the Jindo 2014, and the Defendant expressed that “Yindo Pool, YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY 43 years old, ought to be identified as “YYYYYYYYYY YYYYYYYYYY YYYYYYYYYY YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

arrow