logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 해남지원 2016.10.27 2015고단512
도박등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 6, 2015, the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender for committing gambling, and was examined within the police box at the Jindo Police Station C (Seoulnam Police Station) around April 23:00, and forged a private document by stating the name of “D”, other than the Defendant’s name, on the column of confirmation letter, which is the investigation document related to the gambling case, and used the forged private document by submitting the said certificate as if it were a document duly formed to E with the circumstances to which the said police box belongs.

2. On April 7, 2015, the Defendant in violation of the Resident Registration Act was arrested as a flagrant offender due to the crime of gambling, and was transferred to the F Team office of the Jindo-gun Police Station in Jindo-gun, Jindo-gun, Jindo-gun, and subsequently, made the name and completion of the name and resident registration number of the police officer in charge of the said gambling case, and made a statement to the Assistant G, a police officer in charge of the said gambling case, as if he were his name and resident registration number, and used the investigation document unlawfully.

3. On April 7, 2015, the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender for committing gambling, was examined at the F Team office of the Jindo-gun Police Station in Jindo-gun, Jindo-gun, Jindo-gun, and forged the name of “D” with the intent to exercise the investigation, and submitted the protocol of interrogation of the suspect committing the name of “D” to the slope G belonging to the said police station, and exercised the forged signature by submitting the protocol of interrogation of the suspect who made the name of “D” to the assistant G belonging to the said police station.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The first police suspect interrogation protocol (D name) against the accused;

1. Copy, etc. of the register;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (for a suspect A, the case concerning the name recognition of D);

1. Article 231 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, the choice of punishment, Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act, Article 239(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 239(2) and (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 239(2) of the Criminal Act, Article 37 of the Resident Registration Act.

arrow