logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2018.01.15 2017고정556
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 9, 2017, the Defendant, at around 05:30, driven a B-hand car while drunkly under the influence of alcohol with approximately 500 meters from the roads near Dong-dong, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, to the 47 white-dong, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, and 0.093% of alcohol concentration in blood.

2. Violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) the Defendant driving of the said car at the time and the pertinent car set forth in paragraph 1, and driving the intersection of the three distance set forth in paragraph 1 at the intersection of the same luminous distance along the one-lane cafeteria, which is the one-lane cafeteria, from the breadth of the said luminous distance to the one-lane cafeteria, and turn to the left at the west of the city.

In this case, the driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to take the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right of operation of the motor vehicle in an accurate manner to prevent the accident.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and left the left while under the influence of alcohol content 0.093% in the blood, and received the part before the driver’s seat of the DNA unclaimed cargo vehicle driven by the victim C (58 e.g., the driver’s seat in front of the driver’s seat of the Defendant’s vehicle, which was driven by the victim C(58 e.g., the Defendant left the right from the left side of the Defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as salt, tension, etc., in need of approximately two weeks of medical treatment due to such occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Reporting on the occurrence of a traffic accident, notification of the results of crackdown on drinking driving, and making an tea inquiry;

1. A C statement;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Relevant Article 3(1) and the proviso to Article 3(2)8 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents by the Selection of Punishment, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Articles 148-2(2)3 and 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act, and the selection of fines for each crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Attraction of a workhouse;

arrow