logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2017.09.08 2017고정61
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of traffic Acts on roads, and violation of traffic Acts on roads;

A. The Defendant is a non-registered driver of the 49c tex.

On July 22, 2016, without obtaining a driver's license for a bicycle for a motor device, the Defendant driven the above 1km section from the front of the KBS third-distance of KBS in the same Eup under the influence of alcohol content of 0.119% during blood, to the roads adjacent to the same Eup/Myeon under the influence of alcohol content of 0.119% during blood.

B. On July 5, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of a fine of 1.5 million won due to a violation of road traffic law (drinking driving), etc. in the Gwangju District Court’s net support on July 5, 2010. On July 26, 2016, the Defendant was a non-registered driver of 49c tex, who was placed in the Gu Police Station for the same crime as the above paragraph (d) and violated the regulations on drinking prohibition twice or more.

On July 23, 2016, the Defendant driven the 500-meter section above, from the day front of the day of the day of the day of the old Gu, which was recognized as having a 0.086% alcohol concentration in the blood while under the influence of alcohol by the Defendant without obtaining a driver’s license for a bicycle for a motor device at around 19:40 on July 23, 2016, to the front of the day of the Gu police station located in 74 in the same Eup/Myeon-ro of the same Eup/Myeon-ro.

2. Violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation;

A. The Defendant is a holder of a non-registered 49c tex 49c tex.

Despite the fact that a motor vehicle not covered by mandatory insurance is prohibited from operating on the road, the defendant operated the above Oral Ba, which was not covered by mandatory insurance at the same time as that set forth in paragraph 1(a).

B. The Defendant is a holder of Unregistered 49cTex, 49c.

Despite the fact that a motor vehicle not covered by mandatory insurance is prohibited from operating on the road, the defendant operated the above Obae that is not covered by mandatory insurance at the same place as that set forth in Paragraph 1(b) above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A report on the circumstances of driving at each week and a report on the state of non-licensed driving.

arrow