1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. Defendant B served as the Vice Minister of Prime Minister from January 2009 to August 201, 2010.

Defendant C, who was a candidate for the President at the time of the presidential election in 2007, was in office as a secretary, etc. at the office of the former president from the time of the presidential election in 2007 to February 2013.

The Plaintiff was in a position of substantially managing affiliates within the group as the president of the H Group, a main company, around the period of the Defendants’ employment.

B. The Plaintiff, at H Group Office around May 2009, requested H Group A to contact with Defendant B at the Prime Minister’s office on his official trip around the day of May 2, 2009. He provided Defendant B with entertainment of KRW 4 million or KRW 5 million to Defendant B, who was on his official trip in Japan, around May 22, 2009. The Plaintiff: “Around December 19, 2007, upon the introduction of the NB loan from the President’s election day to the F President’s office, Defendant C meta or was elected. At the time of the introduction of the NB’s NB loan from the F President’s election day, Defendant C was required to take personnel management to K, Defendant C et al., who was on his front president’s side, and Defendant C et al., and brought about KRW 3 million to gift vouchers in 2008, KRW 200,000, KRW 500,000,00 gift certificates.

Around November 2008, Defendant C was aware of the Plaintiff and posted the Plaintiff at the front page at the KEXE Trade Promotion Association, and the President and the President had given an opportunity to exchange the said contents. Such remarks were reported to a large number of media.

C. The Defendants are also the Defendants.

On September 27, 2011, the Plaintiff filed a complaint with the Seoul Central District Public Prosecutor's Office on the charge of defamation by publication. Around that time, each Seoul Central District Public Prosecutor's Office filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiff for damages due to defamation. On December 27, 2011, there was a decision made by the public prosecutor on December 27, 201 regarding the above criminal complaint case, and each of the civil cases is the same.