A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four years.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud) did not have worked as a staff member of the Blue House at the time of the president’s holding office, and did not have any intention or ability to invest in the business of developing the Blue House Housing Complex or the construction business of the Blue House, which was promoted by the D President, not by marriage with Japan, and his mother did not have any certificate of confirmation of the balance of the refund amount issued in the name of Japanese registry (the current financial nature) and there was any forgery of the certificate of confirmation of the balance of refund amount of KRW 500 billion at face value issued in the name of Japanese registry (the current financial nature).

Nevertheless, from July 2010 to July 2011, the Defendant displayed a copy of the certificate of confirmation of the balance of the refund to the victim G, the representative director of E, in the E office located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F, and served in the office section of the D President Cho Jong-ro.

The mother of the Republic of Korea issued a certificate of confirmation of the balance of 500 billion UN refund amount to Na, the only stalk, after having married with Japan's yellow families, who died.

Investment of 50 billion won in the housing complex development project promoted in Vietnam, and investment of 50 billion won in the housing complex construction project in Yanan-si.

On August 9, 2011, a false statement stating that “The expenses and activity expenses are different for the franchising of a certificate of confirmation of balance of the refund amount” was received from the injured party from the National Bank account of H 20 million won under the name of the Defendant on the pretext of expenses, etc. necessary for the franchising of a certificate of confirmation of balance of the refund amount for the raising of the refund amount, and around that time, from November 5, 2014 to November 5, 2014, the Defendant deceiving the injured party, such as the statement in the list of crimes in the attached Table, and its affiliated funds were made over 74 times from the injured party