Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months and by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months.

except that from the date of this judgment.

Punishment of the crime

Defendants are customers who provided meals at the “D” restaurant in Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government and 1, and E (30) and victim F (24) are employees of the said restaurant.

The Defendants, on October 6, 2017, calculated the total amount of 54,700 won and the total amount of 40,000 won at the above restaurant around 13:00 on October 6, 201, and then transferred the remainder to the account.

And the restaurant has been in place, and E, an employee E, followed and "in order to the effect that the deposit is confirmed, the picture was put to E and the city.

1. Defendants in violation of the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (joint assault) against the victim F was set at the above date, time, and at the above place, the victim F was set out outside the restaurant in order for the victim F to fight, and the victim F was set up three times by head in the case of Defendant B, and the victim’s chest was set up by her head, and the Defendant A was set up one time at the victim’s right shoulder and one time at the victim’s right shoulder by her hand.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly assaulted the victim.

2. Defendant B’s interference with the performance of official duties, and the injured Defendant’s injury: (a) arrested the police officers called up upon receiving a report on the date and time as indicated in the above 1.1; (b) arrested A as the current offender of the assault; and (c) prevented the police officers from getting off and leaving the patrols by getting off the front door of the patrols at the patrols (No. 13); (d) prevent the police officers from getting off the patrols at other patrols (No. 11) by getting off the patrols at the back of the patrols (No. 49 years old); and (e) prevent the police officers from getting off the patrols at other patrols (No. 49 years old); and (e) put them into the right part of the police officer’s Ha (No. 40 years old); and (e) put them into force.

As a result, the defendant interfered with police officers' legitimate execution of their duties on the handling of 112 reported cases, and at the same time, the victim H was faced with an influence to the right side of the number of days of treatment.

3. Defendant B-.