1. The action of a change in exchange in the trial shall be dismissed in the part of illegality of the omission;

2. The plaintiff's remainder.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, which the court should explain about this case, is as follows: "original assault" in Section 2, Section 11, Section 3, Section 17, Section 2, Section 3, Section 20, Section 20, Section 20, Section 3, and Section 20, Section 420, Section 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, is the same as the entry of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the case where the defendant prepares an appraisal report or presents it to the head of Seoul Southern-gu Police Station," respectively. Thus, it is cited as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation

2. The conclusion is that the lawsuit seeking confirmation of illegality of omission (the part seeking confirmation of invalidity of the written appraisal, which is an action against the plaintiff, was withdrawn due to the exchange change of the lawsuit filed in the trial, and the judgment of the court of first instance is invalidated) is unlawful. Thus, the remaining part of the lawsuit in this case (hereinafter "the part of the lawsuit in this case") is also unlawful and dismissed. As to the remaining part, the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal against the remaining part is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.