logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.01.10 2016나32443
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim that is changed in exchange in the trial is dismissed.

2. All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following cases: "a defendant seeks the implementation of the procedure for the registration of cancellation of ownership transfer due to the restoration of real name" in the second, fourth, and fifth of the judgment of the court of first instance; "the defendant has the obligation to implement the procedure for the registration of cancellation of ownership transfer due to the restoration of real name" in the third, second and second of the judgment; "the defendant has the obligation to perform the procedure for the registration of cancellation of ownership transfer due to the restoration of real name to the plaintiff who solely inherited the real estate of this case."

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim that is changed in exchange in the trial is dismissed as it is without merit (the plaintiff's claim for transfer registration based on the restoration of real name in the previous trial is withdrawn from the claim due to the exchange change in the lawsuit filed in the trial and the judgment of the court of first instance was invalidated). It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow