logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.09.14 2016나63593
사해행위취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim that is changed in exchange in the trial is dismissed.

2. All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The reasons why the court should explain the instant case in this case are as follows: “................” the reasons why the court should explain the instant case in the first instance court’s judgment are as follows: “...........”; “.....” “....” “......” “........” “..................” “.............”; “173,504,00 won,” “..........” “................” “.....................” “for the deletion” under the first instance court’s judgment,” “173,360,000 won,” respectively.

2. In conclusion, the Plaintiff’s claim that was changed in exchange at the trial is dismissed as it is without merit (the judgment of the court of first instance is invalidated since the Plaintiff’s claim was withdrawn from the exchange of lawsuit due to the revocation of each fraudulent act of KRW 173,500,00, which was concluded on September 7, 2013 between the Defendant who is the former Defendant and C, and the donation contract of KRW 69,34,000,000, which was concluded on October 1, 2013, and the donation contract of KRW 104,016,00,000, which was concluded on October 1, 2013).

arrow