Defendant

A Imprisonment of eight months, Defendant B, and C shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,00,000, Defendant D, E, and G shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,00,00.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant B, Defendant C, Defendant D, Defendant E, and Defendant G, together with J, and K from November 20, 2016 to October 23:10 of the same day, 2016, each of the three-story assembly typeed buildings located in public L L from November 20, 2016 by using 52 trum cards and dividing each of the three-story cards into four, and then the next person took money from KRW 3,000 in the order of order, and then the next person additionally took an amount equivalent to half of the printing amount each time he additionally receives the card, and the sum of the pattern and number of the card is called “a Baduk” in several ways by a person whose total sum is the lowest.

2. The Defendant, at the date, time, and place specified in paragraph (1), provided that he/she received KRW 20,00 per hour from gambling participants listed in paragraph (1) and provided a trum card, etc. for gambling as described in paragraph (1), and opened a gambling house for profit-making purposes. In addition, the Defendant established a gambling house in the same manner five times around October 22, 2016, around October 26, 2016, around October 29, 2016, around October 29, 2016, around November 5, 2016, and around November 9, 2016.

3. Defendant F, with knowledge of the fact that the above B, etc. were stuffed as described in paragraph 1 at the date and time, at the place specified in paragraph 1, the Defendant: (a) reported CCTV installed in the above place to assist them; (b) controlled those who entered the above place; (c) received an amount of money from those who participated in gambling and received an amount of money from others, and (d) prevented them from gambling.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning suspect interrogation of the defendant A by the prosecution;

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the Defendants

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police suspect to J or K;

1. Protocols of seizure, lists of seizure, and respective investigation reports (as to attachment of photographs of seized articles, attaching copies of books A by suspect A, and telephone conversations details);

1. Explanation- Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of seized articles;

1. Relevant Articles of the Act and the choice of punishment concerning the facts constituting the crime;