1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. During the disposition, the following facts are: (a) the tourism channel of May 22, 2014 (B-2) the date of entry into the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea of the date of filing an application for refugee status recognition (hereinafter “instant disposition”) and (b-2) the details of the application for refugee status recognition on October 26, 2016 of the date of filing the application for refugee status recognition (hereinafter “instant disposition”); (b) the facts that there is no dispute over the recognition of the contents of the decision to dismiss the application as of October 28, 2016 of the date of filing the application for objection that there is no sufficient ground for recognizing refugee status status status: (c) the facts that there is no ground for recognizing the contents of the decision to dismiss the application on April 21, 2017 of the date of filing

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion is a person of nationality of the Republic of mentmen (hereinafter “mentmen”).

There is a dispute between the government of the mentmen, who supports the Houth and the hydro-sulpary forest as an organization of the Amaros.

The father of the plaintiff was the police, and he participated in the post-ment force at the time of the mentmen police authority.

The plaintiff was also involved in the demonstration against the latter.

For this reason, the latter forces threatened the plaintiff's family members, and the plaintiff has been in the Republic of Korea regardless of the victim's example.

As such, the Plaintiff’s return to mentor is likely to be detrimental to the latter’s ability, and thus, ought to be recognized as a refugee.

B. Determination 1) Article 2 Subparag. 1 of the Refugee Act defines a refugee as “a foreigner who is unable to be protected or does not want to be protected by the country of nationality due to well-founded fear to recognize that he/she may be injured on the grounds of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group, or political opinion, or who is a stateless foreigner who is unable or does not want to return to the country in which he/she had resided before entering the Republic of Korea due to such fear.” 2) The foregoing evidence and evidence as mentioned in subparagraph 3 are revealed by adding the whole purport of the pleadings to the statement in subparagraph 3. In full view of the following circumstances, the Plaintiff can be seen as the Plaintiff.