logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2018.04.06 2018구단2103
난민불인정결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. In the course of the disposition, the following facts: (a) the tourism channel of April 3, 2017 (B-2) the date of entry into the Republic of Korea of the U.S. on the date of the application for refugee status recognition (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on April 28, 2017; (b) the date of the application for refugee status recognition (hereinafter “instant disposition”); (c) there is no dispute over the grounds for recognition of refugee status non-recognition: the fact that there is no ground for recognition of the decision to dismiss the decision of December 7, 2017 of the date of the application for objection as of July 4, 2017; (d) the statements in subparagraphs 1, 2, 1, and 2, 1, and 2, and the purport of the entire pleadings; and (e) the purport of the entire pleadings.

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's assertion is a national of the Egypt Republic of Egypt (hereinafter "Egypt").

On January 25, 2011, the Plaintiff joined the Muslim blackout group. On January 25, 201, the Plaintiff participated in the military illegal demonstration organized by the Muslimout group.

Since the 2013 Military Coup in 2013, B was considered as an illegal organization after the collapse, the pressure of Egypt government's unslive forest model continues to exist.

Around August 2016, police was found as the plaintiff's house. However, the plaintiff did not put the plaintiff's house simply due to her friendship.

As such, if the Plaintiff returned to Egypt, he/she is likely to be stuffed on the ground that he/she is a member of Egypted Egypt.

B. Determination 1) Article 2 Subparag. 1 of the Refugee Act defines a refugee as “a foreigner who is unable or does not want to be protected by the country of nationality due to well-founded fear to recognize that he/she may be injured on the grounds of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group, or political opinion, or who is a stateless foreigner who, due to such fear, could not return to or does not want to return to the country in which he/she had resided before entering the Republic of Korea.” 2) The aforementioned evidence and the evidence set forth in subparagraph 3 can be seen as being obtained by adding the entire purpose of pleading to the statement in the evidence set forth in subparagraph 3.

arrow