1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The details of the disposition are the Plaintiff’s nationality.

On June 23, 2015, the date of entry into the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea for a short-term stay visit (C-3) refugee status application (hereinafter “instant disposition”) (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on July 6, 2015, the decision of May 29, 2017, which was rendered on May 29, 2015: The facts that there is no dispute as to the grounds for rejection of the decision of December 7, 2017, which was the date of the application for objection that was the date of the decision of June 7, 2017, and that there is no ground for rejection to the decision of the decision of December 7, 2017, which was the date of the decision of June 7, 2017.

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's assertion is well-known.

The Republic of Korea is a national of the Republic of Korea (hereinafter referred to as “Korea”).

In 2003, the Plaintiff joined Party B and participated in the assembly from this time.

Accordingly, the plaintiff is well-known.

Murder, such as intimidation, was caused by the sacrificing of the government or a woman.

Accordingly, the plaintiff has been in the Republic of Korea since he did not leave the Republic of Korea.

As such, the Plaintiff is well-known.

188 10 10 10 12

Since there is a risk of persecution from the government or the ruling party, refugee status should be recognized.

B. Determination 1) Article 2 Subparag. 1 of the Refugee Act defines a refugee as “a foreigner who is unable to be protected or does not want to be protected by the country of nationality due to well-founded fear to recognize that he/she may be injured on the grounds of race, religion, nationality, membership of a specific social group, or political opinion, or a foreigner who is not able to return to or does not want to return to the country in which he/she had resided before entering the Republic of Korea due to such fear.” In full view of the following circumstances revealed by adding up the evidence and the purport of the entire arguments in Articles 3 and 4 as well as the evidence as stated above, “a well-founded fear on the grounds of race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group, or political opinion.”