beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. The details of the disposition are as follows: (a) the tourism channel of May 14, 2014 (B-2) the date of entry into the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea of the date of filing an application for refugee status recognition (hereinafter “instant disposition”) and (b-2) November 30, 2016 of the date of filing the application for refugee status recognition (hereinafter “instant disposition”); (b) the facts that there is no dispute over the recognition of the decision of rejection as of January 24, 2017 of the date of filing the application for objection that there is no sufficient ground for recognizing refugee status status status: (c) the facts that there is no ground for recognizing the decision of rejection as of June 8, 2017 of the date of filing the application for objection; (d) Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2
2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful
A. The Plaintiff’s assertion is a person of nationality, who is the Republic of mentmen (hereinafter “Emenmen”) of the Republic of mentmen (hereinafter “Emenmen”).
The plaintiff was threatened with murder by Bamen as an organization of Sapmenaos, and the plaintiff has been treated as the Republic of Korea regardless of his mentmen.
The plaintiff needs to be recognized as a refugee since he/she is likely to be threatened again from the latter, if he/she returns to the mentor.
B. Determination 1) Article 2 Subparag. 1 of the Refugee Act defines a refugee as “a foreigner who is unable to be protected or does not want to be protected by the country of nationality due to well-founded fear to recognize that he/she may be injured on the grounds of race, religion, nationality, membership of a specific social group, or political opinion, or a foreigner who does not want to be protected, or who, due to such fear, cannot return to or does not want to return to the country in which he/she had resided before entering the Republic of Korea.” 2) In full view of the following circumstances revealed through the evidence and evidence Nos. 3 and 4-1 of the evidence, and the whole purport of arguments, the Plaintiff cannot be deemed to have “a well-founded fear of being harming on the grounds of race, religion, nationality, membership of a specific social group, or political opinion,” and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this otherwise, the Plaintiff’s application for refugee status recognition is rejected.