1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Summary of the plaintiffs' assertion

A. The Ministry of Employment and Labor and the Human Resources Development Service of the parties (hereinafter “Defendant Corporation”) are persons in charge of the “E Programs”, which is a youth job creation project to provide young employees with language ability and job skills training for young employees, and Defendant D University Industry Cooperation Foundation (hereinafter “Defendant Cooperation Agency”) is a person who is selected as a trustee to actually perform the work related to the “E Programs” and is engaged in the acquisition of F qualification certificates and regular employment process (hereinafter “instant training course”) while receiving subsidies from the Defendant Corporation.

The Plaintiffs were selected and supported in the instant training course on November 2016 for overseas employment, and completed the training course from around that time to March 2017 (a G qualification certificate conducted in the Republic of Korea, the Philippines language training, and the Australia local education schedule).

The Plaintiffs were expected to obtain the F qualification certificate (F, Issuing Authorities: H, hereinafter referred to as “F”) after completion and to be employed as G in Australia on the basis of this.

B. The Defendant Cooperation Agency and its employees, and the Defendant Cooperation Agency and its employees in tort liability under the Civil Act, violated their duty to fairly and transparently conduct overseas employment training by promoting the Plaintiffs with respect to the instant training course, such as false or exaggerated publicity, etc. In Korea, only training was conducted at a very low level, and voluntarily changed the training course, and committed tort, such as intentionally or negligently neglecting the supervision and supervision of I, a person in charge of local education abroad.

In addition, I in charge of on-the-spot education for the plaintiffs in Australia did not have the ability and intention to acquire F from the beginning to the plaintiffs or to provide normal G employment mediation, and it was notarized by creating a false certificate of qualification.