beta
Text
The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The judgment of the first instance.
Reasons
1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition of the court's decision to this case under paragraph (2) of this Article, and therefore, it shall be cited in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of
2. The plaintiff asserts that the court's additional decision in this court stated that "the plaintiff entered into a genuine marital relationship with B, and faithfully performs his/her duty of living together, support and cooperation as a husband and wife. However, even if the plaintiff had been living far away from his/her long-distance workplace due to the lack of economic circumstances, the disposition of this case which rejected the extension of the plaintiff's sojourn period on the ground of lack of marriage authenticity is unlawful."
The above assertion made by the plaintiff in this court is not different from the contents of the plaintiff's claim in the first instance court. The first instance court's decision rejecting the plaintiff's claim is justified upon examining both the evidence submitted in the first instance court and the evidence submitted in this court (A11-1, 2, A12-17, and B 12) (in particular, the plaintiff's statement was submitted to the purport that the marriage with the plaintiff is true, and the circumstances and the purport of the arguments presented in detail in the first instance court's judgment cited earlier are known to the purport that the marriage with the plaintiff is true, and as the plaintiff who filed a marriage report with B prior to about about about 10 years is still unable to communicate with B without interpretation due to the lack of Korean language, it is difficult to believe that the statement in the first instance court's judgment dismissing the plaintiff's claim as above is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed, and the costs of appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff who lost the plaintiff.