The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition of the court's decision to this case under paragraph (2) of this Article, and therefore, it shall be cited in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of

2. The plaintiff asserts that "The plaintiff, as a member of the NRM Porouth in U.S., was arrested by police after engaging in a political activity, such as participation in a large-scale counter-government demonstration, while working as the representative of the plaintiff's university branch, and later arrested him/her. Since he/she was sexually affected by persecution and water adviser due to political reasons, he/she constitutes a refugee."

The above assertion made by the plaintiff in this court is not different from the contents of the plaintiff's assertion in the first instance court. However, the first instance court's decision rejecting the plaintiff's assertion is justified even if both the evidence submitted in the first instance court and the evidence submitted in this court (including A17, 18, B8-12, and 8-12) are examined.

3. Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance, which dismissed the plaintiff's claim based on the conclusion, is justifiable, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit, and the costs of appeal are borne by the losing plaintiff.