The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, except for the addition of the court's judgment to this case, and thus, it is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it is also accepted by the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The Plaintiff asserts that the instant disposition, which rejected the Plaintiff’s application for extension of sojourn period, was erroneous on the grounds that the Plaintiff was married to B with the genuine intention of marriage, and died together with the husband and wife.”

The above assertion made by the plaintiff in this court is not different from the contents of the plaintiff's assertion in the first instance court, and the first instance court's rejection of the plaintiff's assertion is justified even if both the evidence submitted in the first instance court and the Gap 4-1-3 submitted in this court were examined.

3. Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance, which dismissed the plaintiff's claim based on the conclusion, is justifiable, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit, and the costs of appeal are borne by the losing plaintiff.