beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. The Defendant, together with B, C, and D of a private document, conspiredd to forge the document as if he had no certain occupation B was working in (ju) A with a view to acquiring the loan from the lending company by using the document as if he had been employed in (ju) a sense of sense.
Defendant B, who moved to a vehicle so that the said B, etc. can communicate with each other; B, who transferred his seal impression to C, a certificate of personal seal impression, and a resident registration certificate, transferred it to D again; D, on October 24, 2012, via a computer, confirms that the obligation to collect income tax was collected at source in the tax column of “B”, “3,200,000”, “3,280”, and “27,280” in the wage amount column, and “the obligation to collect income as above,” and “the obligation to collect source was collected at source.”
On October 24, 2012, “Tax Accountants E”, etc. were prepared and printed out.
Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with B, C, and D, forged the original collection certificate of income tax in the name of E, a private document on fact certification for the purpose of uttering.
2. Around November 21, 2012, the Defendant, along with B and C, exercised the said investigation document collection certificate as if it were a document duly formed, on the one hand, an employee of the said company, who was aware of the forgery at the office of the said company, at the office of Gan Capital Co., Ltd., in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, as the Haguero 126,8 level.
3. The Defendant, together with B and C, submitted a certificate of source collection of income tax that was forged to one of the victims at the time and place specified in paragraph 2, and had been transferred to B, as if he had the ability to repay the amount, by deceiving the victim as if he had the ability to repay the said amount. The Defendant was loaned KRW 13,000,000 from the victim.
Summary of Evidence
1. A protocol concerning the examination of partially the accused by the prosecution;
1. Protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect B by the prosecution (including the part concerning the F statement);
1. A protocol concerning suspect interrogation of C by the prosecution;
1. G. G.