logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2014.10.01 2014고정2705
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant and B posted a letter from C as if they sold the goods on the Internet NAVV online website, and received a proposal from a purchaser who reported and contacted the writing to use the goods at the price for the goods, and C posted it on the above website. The Defendant and B conspired with C to divide the amount of goods by receiving money from the purchaser by lending the Defendants’ mobile phone to C and allowing C to have telephone conversations with the buyer or to use text messages when sending text messages.

1. On May 26, 2012, the Defendant made a false statement to deliver the said content to the Defendant and the victim D who reported and contacted by inserting a mobile phone number of KRW 450,000, when he/she transferred KRW 450,000 from the sales proceeds to the victim D, at a place where it is impossible to identify a place below Busan and below Busan around January 18, 2012, as seen above, C connected to the NA, and sold “Cobeber2.”

However, the defendant, B, and C had no intention or ability to deliver the content, even if they received money from the victim from the victim as they did not possess the content of selling to the victim and used only the content sales proceeds from the beginning.

In collusion with B and C, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received 450,000 won from the victim to the national bank account in the name of E under the pretext of sales proceeds.

2. On May 27, 2012, the Defendant, in collusion with B and C on May 27, 2012, in a place where it is impossible to know the place not exceeding Busan on May 27, 2012, the Defendant made a false statement that he/she would sell 600,000 won to the victim F by means of the said method, and the Defendant received 600,000 won as the sales proceeds of the said Kameras from the victim to the account as stated in the above 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant;

arrow