Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.
If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On May 14, 2010, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 700,000,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the port branch of the Daegu District Court in the Daegu District Court (Sponding on May 14, 2010) and received a summary order of KRW 700,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the port branch of the Daegu District Court (Sponding on July 1,
On October 27, 2012, the Defendant, without obtaining a driver’s license on October 27, 2012, driven a C Car in the section of approximately 1 km to the front of the port customs office located in the port of port in the port of port in front of the port of port in lieu of the port of port in the state of drunk alcohol concentration of 0.092%.
2. When the Defendant, at the same time and at a place as set forth in paragraph (1), was subject to drinking control, at the guard and traffic of the coastwise Police Station, and the slopeD affiliated with the traffic control system, the Defendant made a signature “E” by using a studio on the notice of the results of drinking driving control, stating the E’s address, resident registration number, etc. based on the Defendant’s statement, and written notice of the results of drinking driving control, which was presented by D, stating the E’s address, resident registration number, etc., and the situation report on the driver’s license.
Accordingly, the defendant, for the purpose of exercising a certificate of fact, forged each notice of the result of drinking driving control in E, which is a private document concerning the certification of fact, and a report on the situation of a drinking driver.
3. The Defendant, at the same time and place as set forth in Paragraph 2, issued a notice of the result of drinking driving control forged at the above time and at the same place, and a written report on the circumstances of the drinking driver was delivered to the guard and the traffic control assistant D, each of which is not aware of the circumstances.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding E;
1. On-going drivers, circumstantial reports, notices of the results of the control of drinking driving, and drinking drivers;