logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2014.08.22 2014고단1691
상해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 00:00 on June 1, 2014, the injured Defendant endeded the victim E (E, South and the age of 36) who was the host of the said restaurant on the ground that the victim E (E, South and the age of 36) did not drink at the D State D State boom in Ulsan-dong, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, but was the customer of the said restaurant, and led the victim E to the victim E, “I am son.” on the ground that the victim’s face was arry, and the victim’s face was taken by drinking at around 14 days.

2. At around 00:20 on June 1, 2014, the Defendant assaulted the victim G on the ground that the victim G, a slope belonging to the F District Unit of the Ulsan-dong Police Station F District, which was dispatched to the site as a static tea with the above assault report and received the above assault report, was prevented from gathering the instant cups on the floor, and he saw the victim G on his hand, and dump dump dump, and dumped with the entrance.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the suppression and investigation of police officers' crimes.

3. The Defendant, who was arrested in the act of committing the crime as described in paragraphs 1 and 2, was arrested as a flagrant offender. On June 1, 2014, “0:35” as stated in the indictment appears to be erroneous and does not hinder the Defendant’s right of defense. Thus, the Defendant’s correction ex officio is made ex officio. After being transferred to the F Zone H located in Ulsan-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-si, the victim I (Nam, 46 years of age), who was a slope belonging to the said District-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-si, expressed a cell phone with an desire to ask the victim’s personal information and put about a part of the victim I’s cell phone, which was cited in the victim I

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties by police officers in the suppression and investigation of crimes, and at the same time injured the victim I.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement to G, I, and E;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes requesting investigation cooperation;

1. Each relevant Article of the Act concerning criminal facts;

arrow