Defendant

B Imprisonment with prison labor for one year and for six months, each of the defendants D.

However, as to Defendant D, this is applicable.

Defendant

B, the facts charged in the written application for permission of changes in the indictment of D were partly corrected or corrected according to the facts obtained through the examination of evidence without the procedures of changes in the indictment to the extent that the basic facts are identical, including apparent errors and errors, and they do not disadvantage the defendants' defense rights.

Defendant

B, from August 25, 2010 to February 27, 2013, M City General Construction Headquarters's construction team (class 6 public officials) is the competent officer (class 6 public officials) in charge of the purchase and ordering of government-funded materials at the construction team of M City General Construction Headquarters, and was in charge of the work of proposing a public notice requesting government-funded materials purchase contract after reviewing the appropriateness of government-funded materials to be used for electrical construction.

Defendant

D From May 20 to May 20, 2008, a person who operates an electrical design service company under the trade name of N Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Co., Ltd.”) (hereinafter referred to as “Co., Ltd.”) from the second name to the date of the “BB”).

C은 LED 조명 제조업체인 ㈜O 의 대표이사이고, O의 직원인 P을 명의 상 대표이사로 내세워 LED 조명 제조업체인 ㈜Q( 변경 전 상호는 ‘ 주식회사 R’ 이다.

A person who actually operates Q Q, regardless of whether it was before or after the change in the trade name, is between Defendant B and Defendant B.

1. The defendant B et al. does not need to be separately stated in the defendant B et al., unless the name of the defendant is indicated in the pertinent item of each defendant, and the remaining defendant is named as the name of the defendant, and when the father is named as the "defendant".

In relation to the facts stated in the written application for permission to amend the Bill of Indictment, it is stated that the defendant committed the crime of interference with bidding in collusion with the head of the electricity team at the general construction headquarters at MM, thereby preventing the defendant from committing the crime of occupational breach of trust, preparation of false official documents, and the crime of interference with bidding in collusion with A and C.

However, the following: