A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.

49,660,280 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

Punishment of the crime

From January 26, 2015, the Defendant is a person in charge of C’s office building facility management and construction work, who was appointed and served as a general secretary of C District Prosecutors’ Office (hereinafter “C”) and a class 8 industrial clerk belonging to C from January 26, 2015.

When there was a need for money to be used for ordinary stock investment transaction, etc., the Defendant ordered C’s government office facility construction and material supply contract to the companies that wish to receive the order for the supply contract, which is higher than the actual cost of construction and material and received part of the difference from C to obtain the money from them.

1. The Ministry of Justice, after the process of performing the CED lighting replacement construction, has carried out a project to replace or install indoor lighting fixtures of a building with ED products in accordance with the "Promotion of Rationalization of Energy Use of Public Institutions" plan since 2016, and has allocated the budget to the Supreme Prosecutors' Office step by step.

Therefore, the Supreme Prosecutors' Office judged that a light that should be replaced by a public prosecutor's office under the jurisdiction of the Supreme Prosecutors' Office should be installed with a light light of low price, which is higher than a low price, such as a light lighting, and that a separate installation work is required for the installation of a ED lighting. As such, it is necessary to install a separate installation work for the installation of ED lighting. Accordingly, the budget of 5,000 won for each lighting, including the material cost and construction cost, was calculated and allocated 59 public prosecutor's offices under the Supreme Prosecutors' Office, and C was allocated a total of 4,300,000 won from the Supreme Prosecutors' Office with a cost of replacing ED lighting.

When the Defendant, who is in charge of the CED lighting replacement project, allocated the budget for the replacement of the CED lighting as above, he purchased the low price of the type light light that does not require any separate installation work, and then acquired the purchase cost of the ED lighting and the installation cost by means of concluding a false contract.

2. The first half of 2017.