beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months, by a fine of three thousand won,00,000 won.
Defendant
B The above fine.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Defendant A
A. From August 21, 2014 to October 17, 2014, the Defendant violated the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. (the Act on the Punishment of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc.) provided that D, from around August 21, 2014 to around October 201, 31, 601, 705, and 811 of Daejeon Jung-gu Etel, such as bed, spons, small wave, and bed through the Internet site (H), employs women engaged in commercial sex acts, such as F, G, etc., and advertised them through Internet site, and mediates them to engage in commercial sex acts by having them engage in commercial sex acts with the above customers, the Defendant: (a) provided that D, who received KRW 130,00 won per month from D and arranged them to engage in commercial sex acts under the name of the lessor; and (b) provided, (c) provided, that the said business of arranging the lessor to transfer commercial sex acts under the name of Defendant D, etc.
B. On October 3, 2014, when the act of arranging sexual traffic committed in the above officetel 705 on October 3, 2014, the Defendant also submitted a false statement that “ he/she had engaged in sexual traffic by leasing No. 705 of his/her office,” which was located in the Daejeon Seo-gu Daejeon Police Station around October 11, 2014, and around November 6, 2014 and around November 27, 2014, the said police station investigation and intelligence team office submitted a false statement to the effect that “the principal engaged in sexual traffic business by leasing No. 311 and 705 of his/her office,” and that “the principal engaged in sexual traffic business” was committed by submitting the above 705 officetel lease agreement and the monthly remittance certificate, etc. to the lessor under his/her name, thereby committing a crime corresponding to the punishment heavier than a fine.
C. On October 17, 2014, the Defendant suggested that the act of arranging sexual traffic, which occurred in the above Etel 311, was recontrold, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “D shall pay a fine of three million won to the other case, and N.D shall arrange sexual traffic as provided in subparagraph 3111.”